Skip to main content

The Neuroscience of Spirituality

An Attempt at Critical Analysis

Pastoral Psychology volume 67, pages 515–524 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Thanks to neuroimaging technology, neuroscientists are attempting to explore the neurological foundations of religious and spiritual experiences. Andrew Newberg advocates calling this field of neuroscience ‘neurotheology’, a term that was first popularized by James Ashbrook, a theologian who studied neuroscience. As with any science, neuroscience has to be examined with a critical eye so that we become capable of seeing its limits clearly. In this particular case, we should recognize the limits of neuroscience in explaining the human relationship to Transcendence. ‘Neuroliteracy’ should be helpful in filtering out the findings of neuroscience that overreach its limits in the explanation of human nature. For a true neuroscience of spirituality, an adequate theological reflection is needed, especially in terms of defining the object of experimentation and, more importantly, for interpreting the results. The neuroscience of spirituality, contrary to the ambitious beliefs of some scholars, seems to be an interdisciplinary research program rather than a scientific discipline on its own. In this article I want to explore the pros and cons of a neuroscience of spirituality, its promises and limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Haiti)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Aaen-Stockdale, C. (2012). Neuroscience for the soul. Psychologist, 25(7), 520–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, C., & Ashbrook, J. (2001). Where god lives in the human brain. New York: Sourcebooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashbrook, J. (1984). Neurotheology: The working brain and the work of theology. Zygon, 19(3), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, M., & O’Leary, D. (2007). The spiritual brain: A neuroscientist’s case for the existence of the soul. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C., Baird, A., Miller, M., & Wolford, G. (2010). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction. Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingaman, K. A. (2013). The promise of neuroplasticity for pastoral care and counseling. Pastoral Psychology, 62, 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. S. (2006). The brain, religion, and baseball: Neurology of religion and religious experience. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (Vol. 2) (pp. 229–244). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, K. (2002, November). The evolution of wonder: Religious and neuroscientific perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion. Toronto: Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aquili, E., & Newberg, A. B. (1999). The mystical mind: Probing the biology of religious experience. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, S., & Wilcox, G. (2016). The counseling implications of neurotheology: A critical review. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 18(2), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, C. (2010). Minding the gap when cognitive neuroscience is a cognate discipline in pastoral theology: Lessons from neurotheology. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 20(2), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feit, J. S. (2004). Probing neurotheology’s brain, or critiquing an emerging quasi-science. Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin, 33(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, P., Fredrikson, M., Unge, P., Hagenfeldt, A., Valind, S., Larhammar, D., & Larsson, M. (2005). Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields. Neuroscience Letters, 379(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. R. (2005). Did all those famous people really have epilepsy? Epilepsy & Behavior, 6(2), 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastrzebski, A. (2012). Towards a better understanding of the philosophy of psychology. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 14, 12–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlhenny, R. (2015). A revolution in mind: Andrew Newberg’s principles of neurotheology. American Theological Inquiry, 8(1), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A. (2010). Methodological principles for research in neurotheology. NeuroQuantology, 8(4), 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A. (2014). The neuroscientific study of spiritual practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(215), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A., & Waldman, M. R. (2010). How god changes your brain: Breakthrough findings from a leading neuroscientist. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persinger, M. A. (1987). Neurobiological bases of god beliefs. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persinger, M. A., Corradini, P. L., Clement, A. L., Keaney, C. C., MacDonald, M. L., Meltz, L. I., . . . & Thompson, S. E. (2010). NeuroTheology and its convergence with NeuroQuantology. NeuroQuantology, 8(4), 432–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K. E. (2001). Neurotheology and evolutionary theology: Reflections on the mystical mind. Zygon, 36(3), 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, E., Lane, R. D., Van Petten, C., & Bandettini, P. A. (2000). Positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. In G. Berntson, J. T. Cacioppo, & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 85–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schjoedt, U. (2009). The religious brain: A general introduction to the experimental neuroscience of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 21, 310–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walach, H., Schmidt, S., & Jonas, W. (Eds.). (2011). Neuroscience, consciousness, and spirituality. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. (2000). The taboo of subjectivity. Toward a new science of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. (2006). Contemplative science: Where Buddhism and neuroscience converge. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenbacher, A. C. (2015). Ten principles for interpreting neuroscientific pronouncements regarding human nature. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 54(1), 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weker, M. (2016). Searching for neurobiological foundations of faith and religion. Studia Humana, 5(4), 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am immensely grateful to Professor James Thomas from Ottawa for his insightful suggestions while I was working on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Counselling, Psychotherapy & Spirituality, Faculty of Human Sciences, Saint Paul University, 223 Main Street, Ottawa, ON, K1S 1C4, Canada

    Andrzej K. Jastrzebski

Authors
  1. Andrzej K. Jastrzebski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrzej K. Jastrzebski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jastrzebski, A.K. The Neuroscience of Spirituality. Pastoral Psychol 67, 515–524 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0840-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0840-2

Keywords

  • Theology
  • Spirituality
  • Religious experiences
  • Neuroscience
  • Brain scans